I really appreciate the larger text in the first image. The bold choice of increasing the text size enhances readability, making the information stand out and easier to process. This is especially helpful when trying to quickly grasp key points without straining to read smaller fonts. It’s a thoughtful touch that caters to accessibility and usability.

That said, when comparing the two, I didn’t notice much difference beyond the text size. The overall composition and layout of the images feel very similar, which made it harder to distinguish unique elements or any significant changes that set them apart. While the first image’s focus on text clarity is commendable, it doesn’t seem to add much beyond that aspect.

On the other hand, the second image does an excellent job at emphasizing the textures. The new textures are far more vivid and detailed in this version, making it easier to appreciate their depth and intricacy. This improvement adds a tactile quality to the image, drawing attention to the design's finer details that may otherwise go unnoticed. It creates a more immersive experience for viewers, allowing them to better understand and evaluate the material or surface being presented.

I like the bigger text on the first one. But I didn’t see any difference between the two. The second picture does a way better job at showing the new textures

Not sure what this is a thumbnail for.

Probably go with the second (the before /after differences in the first are subtle enough not to be a great help)

i vote for the 2 og