6
Murder scene
An inventor named Max accidentally shrinks himself and falls on an apple. Nobody knows where he is now. What happened???
Post a comment if you know
Post a comment if you know
Create an account or sign in to comment.
48
My first thought was that someone ate the apple.
You, trans sir, are correct
An inventor named Max accidentally shrinks himself and falls on an apple.
I bet that's what happened.
I bet that's what happened.
OH MY GOSH YOU suck
His mom ate him and then died of grief.
he fell into the pit where the stem is and got lost :(
:(
Ah, a classic case of shrinkage gone awry, but with a dark twist! Let’s break it down.
Scene: The Shrinking Incident
Max, the inventor, is working in his lab—perhaps he's toying with an experimental device designed to shrink objects or himself. But, in true Murphy's Law fashion, something goes wrong. Maybe he miscalculated the power output, or perhaps an unexpected fluctuation in energy altered the shrink ray's frequency. The device misfires, and poof, Max shrinks down to the size of a mere few millimeters, barely noticeable to the naked eye.
As he's reeling from the sudden loss of stature, Max stumbles into an apple, which, in his diminished state, now appears as if it's a massive, towering structure. He's dazed, confused, and unsure of how to reverse the process.
But what happens next is... sinister.
The "Murder Scene"
Max, in his miniaturized state, is completely vulnerable to the environment around him. The apple, now the size of a building, is not just a harmless fruit. As Max tries to gather his bearings, something happens: The apple—perhaps in a moment of gruesome irony—starts to roll, or maybe there's a tremor in the ground that causes it to shift. Either way, Max is crushed beneath the weight of the apple, unaware that his proximity to it has caused a fatal accident.
Who did it? Was it Murder?
Max's death could be ruled an accident... or was it? The scene is highly suspicious.
1. The Apple - The "Murder Weapon": The apple seems like a benign object, but in this context, it becomes a towering, deadly force. But did it roll on its own? Could someone have pushed it? Was there foul play involved? Was someone else in the lab when Max shrank? Could they have intentionally placed the apple in his path or manipulated the situation to "accidentally" kill him?
2. The Shrinking Device - The "Murder Tool": Max's invention, while intended to shrink objects, could have been tampered with. Was the shrink ray malfunctioning due to sabotage? Did someone cause it to misfire, turning Max's size reduction into a deadly trap?
3. The Lab - A Scene of Deception?: Perhaps Max wasn’t just experimenting for scientific discovery—maybe he was working on something that others wanted to steal, sabotage, or control. The idea of a "shrink ray" could be dangerous in the wrong hands, and if someone knew that Max was on the verge of a breakthrough, they might have sought to eliminate him. Was his death just collateral damage in a larger conspiracy?
Theories:
1. Accidental Death: Max was shrinking himself, experimenting with his invention, and got too close to the apple, which, in its oversized form, rolled over him. It was a tragic mishap, with no malice intended—just bad luck and science gone wrong.
2. Sabotage: Max's invention may have been sabotaged by a rival scientist or a co-worker. Perhaps someone in the lab knew how to exploit the malfunctioning shrink ray and used it to shrink Max, leaving him defenseless and unaware of the impending danger. The apple could have been placed deliberately as a trap.
3. Foul Play (Pre-Meditated Murder): Max’s death could have been a deliberate act, made to look like an accident. Someone might have known about Max’s work and tried to take advantage of his shrinking accident, pushing the apple onto him or setting up the conditions for it to fall. The shrink ray may have been tampered with to ensure Max couldn’t undo his situation, and the apple became the murder weapon of opportunity.
Conclusion
So, what happened? Max shrank down due to his own invention, likely in a freak accident. However, the situation raises a number of questions that cast doubt on the true cause of his demise. The apple, in this case, is both the instrument of his end and the symbol of an unexpected downfall. Whether it was pure accident or a deliberate act of foul play remains shrouded in mystery, and the case could take many twists and turns.
Perhaps the real question is: who benefits from Max's death—and who would want him out of the picture?
Scene: The Shrinking Incident
Max, the inventor, is working in his lab—perhaps he's toying with an experimental device designed to shrink objects or himself. But, in true Murphy's Law fashion, something goes wrong. Maybe he miscalculated the power output, or perhaps an unexpected fluctuation in energy altered the shrink ray's frequency. The device misfires, and poof, Max shrinks down to the size of a mere few millimeters, barely noticeable to the naked eye.
As he's reeling from the sudden loss of stature, Max stumbles into an apple, which, in his diminished state, now appears as if it's a massive, towering structure. He's dazed, confused, and unsure of how to reverse the process.
But what happens next is... sinister.
The "Murder Scene"
Max, in his miniaturized state, is completely vulnerable to the environment around him. The apple, now the size of a building, is not just a harmless fruit. As Max tries to gather his bearings, something happens: The apple—perhaps in a moment of gruesome irony—starts to roll, or maybe there's a tremor in the ground that causes it to shift. Either way, Max is crushed beneath the weight of the apple, unaware that his proximity to it has caused a fatal accident.
Who did it? Was it Murder?
Max's death could be ruled an accident... or was it? The scene is highly suspicious.
1. The Apple - The "Murder Weapon": The apple seems like a benign object, but in this context, it becomes a towering, deadly force. But did it roll on its own? Could someone have pushed it? Was there foul play involved? Was someone else in the lab when Max shrank? Could they have intentionally placed the apple in his path or manipulated the situation to "accidentally" kill him?
2. The Shrinking Device - The "Murder Tool": Max's invention, while intended to shrink objects, could have been tampered with. Was the shrink ray malfunctioning due to sabotage? Did someone cause it to misfire, turning Max's size reduction into a deadly trap?
3. The Lab - A Scene of Deception?: Perhaps Max wasn’t just experimenting for scientific discovery—maybe he was working on something that others wanted to steal, sabotage, or control. The idea of a "shrink ray" could be dangerous in the wrong hands, and if someone knew that Max was on the verge of a breakthrough, they might have sought to eliminate him. Was his death just collateral damage in a larger conspiracy?
Theories:
1. Accidental Death: Max was shrinking himself, experimenting with his invention, and got too close to the apple, which, in its oversized form, rolled over him. It was a tragic mishap, with no malice intended—just bad luck and science gone wrong.
2. Sabotage: Max's invention may have been sabotaged by a rival scientist or a co-worker. Perhaps someone in the lab knew how to exploit the malfunctioning shrink ray and used it to shrink Max, leaving him defenseless and unaware of the impending danger. The apple could have been placed deliberately as a trap.
3. Foul Play (Pre-Meditated Murder): Max’s death could have been a deliberate act, made to look like an accident. Someone might have known about Max’s work and tried to take advantage of his shrinking accident, pushing the apple onto him or setting up the conditions for it to fall. The shrink ray may have been tampered with to ensure Max couldn’t undo his situation, and the apple became the murder weapon of opportunity.
Conclusion
So, what happened? Max shrank down due to his own invention, likely in a freak accident. However, the situation raises a number of questions that cast doubt on the true cause of his demise. The apple, in this case, is both the instrument of his end and the symbol of an unexpected downfall. Whether it was pure accident or a deliberate act of foul play remains shrouded in mystery, and the case could take many twists and turns.
Perhaps the real question is: who benefits from Max's death—and who would want him out of the picture?
Ooooh, things just got real interesting! The plot thickens, and TechyMilk's cryptic, ominous words are raising some serious red flags. Let’s break it down:
The New Evidence: TechyMilk’s Words
From what TechyMilk said, there are some alarming clues that suggest TechyMilk might know more about Max’s demise—or even be directly involved. Let’s analyze:
1. "He.....I'm not giving you the answer, you butt nugget, cuz I'm a MONSTER"
- "Monster": TechyMilk calls himself a "MONSTER," which could be a metaphor for his behavior or perhaps an indicator of his true nature. If he’s claiming to be a "monster," it suggests he might be reveling in some sort of sinister role. It's a possible hint at guilt or an identity he embraces—one who enjoys or even takes pride in causing harm.
2. "I WILL DO THE SAME THING TO YOU AS I DID TO MAX"
- Direct Threat: TechyMilk's statement is chilling, as it implies that whatever happened to Max, TechyMilk has the means and the intention to do it again—this time to you. The wording is extremely specific: "the same thing to you as I did to Max." This suggests that TechyMilk knows exactly what happened to Max and might have even orchestrated it.
- If we take this literally, it implies that TechyMilk might have played a direct role in Max's death. Given the earlier theory that Max was shrunk by his own device, it suggests that TechyMilk might have tampered with the shrink ray or caused the chain of events that led to Max being crushed by the apple.
3. "moans"
- This is a particularly disturbing detail. The "moans" could imply something more twisted than mere casual threats. It could hint at the pleasure TechyMilk takes in the act of causing harm—or it could be a sign of someone toying with their victim emotionally, perhaps deriving satisfaction from psychological manipulation as much as the physical harm.
Analyzing the Motive and Connection to Max’s Death
Based on this new information, it seems likely that TechyMilk may have had a role in Max’s death, if not being the perpetrator himself. Here are some possible theories:
1. TechyMilk Sabotaged the Shrinking Device:
- TechyMilk might have been aware of Max’s shrinking experiment and either intentionally tampered with the machine or manipulated Max into using it at a crucial moment. The implication in the phrase “I WILL DO THE SAME THING TO YOU AS I DID TO MAX” suggests that the incident was not just a random accident but a deliberate action. TechyMilk could have either tricked Max into using the device or tampered with it so it malfunctioned, causing Max to shrink to an uncontrollable size, ultimately leading to his demise under the weight of the apple.
2. Psychological Manipulation or Victimization:
- The mention of "moans" could indicate that TechyMilk enjoys psychologically toying with his victims as much as causing physical harm. This could suggest a more sinister and manipulative character—someone who enjoys watching others suffer, perhaps because Max’s shrinkage (and eventual death) was not only an accident but a cruel game TechyMilk played. In this case, Max's accident wasn't merely an unfortunate mishap, but part of a larger, darker scheme designed by TechyMilk.
3. Personal Vendetta:
- If TechyMilk and Max were competitors or had some kind of rivalry (perhaps related to the shrinking technology), then TechyMilk might have had a personal reason to want Max out of the way. This could be a case of malicious sabotage aimed at eliminating Max’s work or reputation. "I will do the same thing to you" could even suggest that TechyMilk had planned more than just a one-off accident and intended to target others involved in the same circle as Max, or that he took personal pleasure in Max’s demise.
4. TechyMilk as a "Monster" in a Literal Sense:
- Let’s take TechyMilk’s self-description literally: perhaps he sees himself as a "monster" because he’s a part of a larger conspiracy or faction involved in nefarious dealings—like a corporation that wants to exploit Max’s shrink ray for malicious purposes. Or maybe TechyMilk isn't human at all; perhaps he’s a metaphorical or literal "monster" who enjoys causing destruction or has a distorted sense of morality, manipulating and harming others as a form of twisted entertainment.
Final Thoughts:
TechyMilk’s cryptic threats and self-professed identity as a "monster" make him look increasingly like the key figure in Max's mysterious death. His detailed knowledge of Max's fate—especially his intention to do the same thing to you—suggests that the incident wasn’t a freak accident but a calculated act, perhaps involving sabotage of Max’s shrinking experiment. The mention of "moans" could be an indicator that TechyMilk takes pleasure in the suffering of others, further confirming his dark and sinister nature.
So, the big question now is: Why did TechyMilk kill Max? Was it for personal gain, a power play, or just a sadistic pleasure? And what happens next? Is your life in danger, or are you about to be pulled into something far bigger than you anticipated?
The New Evidence: TechyMilk’s Words
From what TechyMilk said, there are some alarming clues that suggest TechyMilk might know more about Max’s demise—or even be directly involved. Let’s analyze:
1. "He.....I'm not giving you the answer, you butt nugget, cuz I'm a MONSTER"
- "Monster": TechyMilk calls himself a "MONSTER," which could be a metaphor for his behavior or perhaps an indicator of his true nature. If he’s claiming to be a "monster," it suggests he might be reveling in some sort of sinister role. It's a possible hint at guilt or an identity he embraces—one who enjoys or even takes pride in causing harm.
2. "I WILL DO THE SAME THING TO YOU AS I DID TO MAX"
- Direct Threat: TechyMilk's statement is chilling, as it implies that whatever happened to Max, TechyMilk has the means and the intention to do it again—this time to you. The wording is extremely specific: "the same thing to you as I did to Max." This suggests that TechyMilk knows exactly what happened to Max and might have even orchestrated it.
- If we take this literally, it implies that TechyMilk might have played a direct role in Max's death. Given the earlier theory that Max was shrunk by his own device, it suggests that TechyMilk might have tampered with the shrink ray or caused the chain of events that led to Max being crushed by the apple.
3. "moans"
- This is a particularly disturbing detail. The "moans" could imply something more twisted than mere casual threats. It could hint at the pleasure TechyMilk takes in the act of causing harm—or it could be a sign of someone toying with their victim emotionally, perhaps deriving satisfaction from psychological manipulation as much as the physical harm.
Analyzing the Motive and Connection to Max’s Death
Based on this new information, it seems likely that TechyMilk may have had a role in Max’s death, if not being the perpetrator himself. Here are some possible theories:
1. TechyMilk Sabotaged the Shrinking Device:
- TechyMilk might have been aware of Max’s shrinking experiment and either intentionally tampered with the machine or manipulated Max into using it at a crucial moment. The implication in the phrase “I WILL DO THE SAME THING TO YOU AS I DID TO MAX” suggests that the incident was not just a random accident but a deliberate action. TechyMilk could have either tricked Max into using the device or tampered with it so it malfunctioned, causing Max to shrink to an uncontrollable size, ultimately leading to his demise under the weight of the apple.
2. Psychological Manipulation or Victimization:
- The mention of "moans" could indicate that TechyMilk enjoys psychologically toying with his victims as much as causing physical harm. This could suggest a more sinister and manipulative character—someone who enjoys watching others suffer, perhaps because Max’s shrinkage (and eventual death) was not only an accident but a cruel game TechyMilk played. In this case, Max's accident wasn't merely an unfortunate mishap, but part of a larger, darker scheme designed by TechyMilk.
3. Personal Vendetta:
- If TechyMilk and Max were competitors or had some kind of rivalry (perhaps related to the shrinking technology), then TechyMilk might have had a personal reason to want Max out of the way. This could be a case of malicious sabotage aimed at eliminating Max’s work or reputation. "I will do the same thing to you" could even suggest that TechyMilk had planned more than just a one-off accident and intended to target others involved in the same circle as Max, or that he took personal pleasure in Max’s demise.
4. TechyMilk as a "Monster" in a Literal Sense:
- Let’s take TechyMilk’s self-description literally: perhaps he sees himself as a "monster" because he’s a part of a larger conspiracy or faction involved in nefarious dealings—like a corporation that wants to exploit Max’s shrink ray for malicious purposes. Or maybe TechyMilk isn't human at all; perhaps he’s a metaphorical or literal "monster" who enjoys causing destruction or has a distorted sense of morality, manipulating and harming others as a form of twisted entertainment.
Final Thoughts:
TechyMilk’s cryptic threats and self-professed identity as a "monster" make him look increasingly like the key figure in Max's mysterious death. His detailed knowledge of Max's fate—especially his intention to do the same thing to you—suggests that the incident wasn’t a freak accident but a calculated act, perhaps involving sabotage of Max’s shrinking experiment. The mention of "moans" could be an indicator that TechyMilk takes pleasure in the suffering of others, further confirming his dark and sinister nature.
So, the big question now is: Why did TechyMilk kill Max? Was it for personal gain, a power play, or just a sadistic pleasure? And what happens next? Is your life in danger, or are you about to be pulled into something far bigger than you anticipated?
Ah, so TechyMilk has finally admitted to causing Max’s death, but the deeper mystery remains: Why did he do it? His cryptic statement, "I caused Max’s death, but why? That is an answer for you to solve," is both a taunt and a challenge. It seems like he's trying to push you towards the truth, perhaps because he's confident that you won’t figure it out—or that the answer is something much more complex than it appears.
Breaking Down TechyMilk’s Statement:
1. "I caused Max's death."
- This is a straightforward confession, but it doesn't give us the full picture. TechyMilk is owning up to his involvement, but *how* he caused it is still open-ended. Was it sabotage, manipulation, or a more direct action? We know he might have tampered with the shrinking device, or even influenced Max’s actions somehow.
2. "You are closer, but not quite there yet."
- This suggests that you’ve been on the right track with your investigation, but there’s still something crucial missing. TechyMilk might be aware that you’re piecing things together but are overlooking a key detail, which will reveal his true motive. What’s the missing link? The answer could be hidden in plain sight or in something overlooked during your analysis.
3. "Why?"
- This is the real question TechyMilk is forcing you to answer. His admission that he caused Max’s death without explaining *why* makes it clear that there’s a deeper motivation behind the act. Was it personal? Professional? Or perhaps something far more twisted, like an experiment in his own cruelty?
Possible Motives for TechyMilk:
Based on what we know about TechyMilk and the situation, here are some possible reasons why he might have caused Max’s death:
1. Jealousy or Rivalry:
- If TechyMilk and Max were competitors, TechyMilk might have seen Max’s shrinking technology as a threat—either to his own scientific discoveries or his reputation. Perhaps TechyMilk didn’t want Max to succeed, especially if Max was close to a breakthrough that could overshadow TechyMilk’s work.
2. Fear of Losing Control:
- If TechyMilk was involved in a corporate or scientific project that aimed to control or weaponize shrinking technology, he might have seen Max as a potential problem. Max’s work could have been too unpredictable or dangerous, and TechyMilk might have believed that eliminating him was the only way to prevent Max from causing chaos or taking credit for something TechyMilk wanted for himself.
3. Sadistic Pleasure:
- Given TechyMilk’s earlier comments about enjoying the "moans" of his victims and his self-labeling as a "monster," there’s a strong possibility that his motive was psychological. TechyMilk might have gotten off on the power he had over Max—especially if he manipulated the situation to make Max’s shrinking more torturous. His motive could simply be a desire to inflict pain and suffering for his own enjoyment, rather than any practical or professional reason.
4. Max’s Discovery of Something TechyMilk Wanted to Hide:
- Max could have stumbled upon a secret or something that threatened TechyMilk’s plans, whether related to the shrinking technology or something more sinister. TechyMilk could have been afraid that Max was getting too close to exposing something that TechyMilk was trying to keep hidden, whether it’s a dark secret about the technology, an illegal application, or even TechyMilk’s true nature as a "monster."
5. TechyMilk's Delusion or Ideology:
- It’s also possible that TechyMilk is operating under some distorted logic, believing that he was justified in killing Max. Perhaps he thought Max was an obstacle to a greater cause—one that TechyMilk truly believes in. He may see himself as a necessary force for something he deems important (such as the evolution of technology, science, or power) and viewed Max as an expendable pawn in that larger scheme.
Next Steps in the Investigation:
If we are to get to the bottom of why TechyMilk killed Max, we need to think about the broader context of Max’s work and TechyMilk’s potential motivations. Here are some next steps we can take:
1. Review Max’s Research:
- Max’s work with the shrinking device is central to the mystery. Perhaps there’s something in his notes or research that could shed light on what he was close to discovering—something that could explain why TechyMilk saw him as a threat. Was Max on the verge of an important breakthrough? Did he uncover something that TechyMilk needed to suppress?
2. Examine TechyMilk’s Background:
- TechyMilk’s cryptic remarks about being a "monster" suggest that his motivations may not be entirely professional. Delving into his past or his ties to the scientific community could uncover a hidden agenda. Was TechyMilk always a part of the same research group, or was there a personal rivalry that escalated into something deadly?
3. Analyze the Shrinking Device Again:
- If the device was tampered with, it could reveal key details about how TechyMilk was involved. Did he know how to sabotage it? Could he have reprogrammed or manipulated the machine in a way that caused the malfunction? A closer inspection of the device could answer questions about how Max was shrunk, and whether TechyMilk had access to it.
4. Question Other Potential Witnesses:
- Were there others involved in Max’s research or who might have seen TechyMilk around the lab? There could be other people who hold pieces of the puzzle—either out of fear or because they’ve remained silent about TechyMilk’s actions. Any witness who might have seen the interaction between TechyMilk and Max could be key in uncovering his true motive.
Conclusion: TechyMilk’s Game
TechyMilk has laid down a challenge for you: to solve the why behind Max’s death. The fact that he confessed to causing Max’s death, but is now baiting you with riddles, shows that he might think he’s already won. However, he’s underestimating your ability to piece things together.
TechyMilk’s next move is crucial: is he truly proud of his actions, or is he trying to mislead you with these twisted games? What’s his endgame, and how far will he go to keep his secrets hidden?
The answers lie in the details—Max’s research, TechyMilk’s history, and the malfunctioning device. Now, the race is on to uncover the full truth before TechyMilk makes his next move.
Breaking Down TechyMilk’s Statement:
1. "I caused Max's death."
- This is a straightforward confession, but it doesn't give us the full picture. TechyMilk is owning up to his involvement, but *how* he caused it is still open-ended. Was it sabotage, manipulation, or a more direct action? We know he might have tampered with the shrinking device, or even influenced Max’s actions somehow.
2. "You are closer, but not quite there yet."
- This suggests that you’ve been on the right track with your investigation, but there’s still something crucial missing. TechyMilk might be aware that you’re piecing things together but are overlooking a key detail, which will reveal his true motive. What’s the missing link? The answer could be hidden in plain sight or in something overlooked during your analysis.
3. "Why?"
- This is the real question TechyMilk is forcing you to answer. His admission that he caused Max’s death without explaining *why* makes it clear that there’s a deeper motivation behind the act. Was it personal? Professional? Or perhaps something far more twisted, like an experiment in his own cruelty?
Possible Motives for TechyMilk:
Based on what we know about TechyMilk and the situation, here are some possible reasons why he might have caused Max’s death:
1. Jealousy or Rivalry:
- If TechyMilk and Max were competitors, TechyMilk might have seen Max’s shrinking technology as a threat—either to his own scientific discoveries or his reputation. Perhaps TechyMilk didn’t want Max to succeed, especially if Max was close to a breakthrough that could overshadow TechyMilk’s work.
2. Fear of Losing Control:
- If TechyMilk was involved in a corporate or scientific project that aimed to control or weaponize shrinking technology, he might have seen Max as a potential problem. Max’s work could have been too unpredictable or dangerous, and TechyMilk might have believed that eliminating him was the only way to prevent Max from causing chaos or taking credit for something TechyMilk wanted for himself.
3. Sadistic Pleasure:
- Given TechyMilk’s earlier comments about enjoying the "moans" of his victims and his self-labeling as a "monster," there’s a strong possibility that his motive was psychological. TechyMilk might have gotten off on the power he had over Max—especially if he manipulated the situation to make Max’s shrinking more torturous. His motive could simply be a desire to inflict pain and suffering for his own enjoyment, rather than any practical or professional reason.
4. Max’s Discovery of Something TechyMilk Wanted to Hide:
- Max could have stumbled upon a secret or something that threatened TechyMilk’s plans, whether related to the shrinking technology or something more sinister. TechyMilk could have been afraid that Max was getting too close to exposing something that TechyMilk was trying to keep hidden, whether it’s a dark secret about the technology, an illegal application, or even TechyMilk’s true nature as a "monster."
5. TechyMilk's Delusion or Ideology:
- It’s also possible that TechyMilk is operating under some distorted logic, believing that he was justified in killing Max. Perhaps he thought Max was an obstacle to a greater cause—one that TechyMilk truly believes in. He may see himself as a necessary force for something he deems important (such as the evolution of technology, science, or power) and viewed Max as an expendable pawn in that larger scheme.
Next Steps in the Investigation:
If we are to get to the bottom of why TechyMilk killed Max, we need to think about the broader context of Max’s work and TechyMilk’s potential motivations. Here are some next steps we can take:
1. Review Max’s Research:
- Max’s work with the shrinking device is central to the mystery. Perhaps there’s something in his notes or research that could shed light on what he was close to discovering—something that could explain why TechyMilk saw him as a threat. Was Max on the verge of an important breakthrough? Did he uncover something that TechyMilk needed to suppress?
2. Examine TechyMilk’s Background:
- TechyMilk’s cryptic remarks about being a "monster" suggest that his motivations may not be entirely professional. Delving into his past or his ties to the scientific community could uncover a hidden agenda. Was TechyMilk always a part of the same research group, or was there a personal rivalry that escalated into something deadly?
3. Analyze the Shrinking Device Again:
- If the device was tampered with, it could reveal key details about how TechyMilk was involved. Did he know how to sabotage it? Could he have reprogrammed or manipulated the machine in a way that caused the malfunction? A closer inspection of the device could answer questions about how Max was shrunk, and whether TechyMilk had access to it.
4. Question Other Potential Witnesses:
- Were there others involved in Max’s research or who might have seen TechyMilk around the lab? There could be other people who hold pieces of the puzzle—either out of fear or because they’ve remained silent about TechyMilk’s actions. Any witness who might have seen the interaction between TechyMilk and Max could be key in uncovering his true motive.
Conclusion: TechyMilk’s Game
TechyMilk has laid down a challenge for you: to solve the why behind Max’s death. The fact that he confessed to causing Max’s death, but is now baiting you with riddles, shows that he might think he’s already won. However, he’s underestimating your ability to piece things together.
TechyMilk’s next move is crucial: is he truly proud of his actions, or is he trying to mislead you with these twisted games? What’s his endgame, and how far will he go to keep his secrets hidden?
The answers lie in the details—Max’s research, TechyMilk’s history, and the malfunctioning device. Now, the race is on to uncover the full truth before TechyMilk makes his next move.
Has anybody read my stuff
no
Mmmhhhhhmmmmmmmmhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhmmm
I don't recall being able to view how many times people have read a comment, so you couldn't possibly know that for a fact.
Can someone is isn't a jerk please say words?
I don't recall being able to view how many times people have read a comment, so you couldn't possibly know that for a fact.
Can someone is isn't a jerk please say words?
I read it. You are closer, but not quite there yet. And yes, I caused Maxs death. But why? That is an answer for you to solve.
What I would have guessed is someone ate him
._.
He.....I'm not giving you the answer, you butt nugget, cuz I'm a MONSTER.
How could you? YOU MONSTER!!!!!!!!!!
I WILL DO THE SAME THING TO YOU AS I DID TO MAX....................moans
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
(enters room sees whats going on.. WHAT IN THE WORLD tosses grenades at you TechyMilk185868
My he- *dies of grenade explosion*
view more replies ( 1 )
