Radioactive barely made any sense at all. I cringed at moments and it really seemed like the only reason the story was written was to include an Imagine Dragons reference....

Didn't really enjoy Downfall of Pluto either since it lacked any real humor and was mainly focused on the quality of the writing, but quality writing is alright with me.

Vote goes to Downfall of Pluto.

Hm... "The Downfall of Pluto" was pretty original, but focused too heavily on the quality of the writing and not enough on the humour aspect. "Radioactive" was its polar opposite: it was much funnier and joyful to read, but the plot and concept was all over the place. It was a tough choice, but I went with Radioactive because it stuck to the theme the most and not at all because it proved that Imagine Dragons are truly the most powerful dragon tamers this earth has ever had the privilege to witness.
pretty sure the name is a reference to the imagine dragons song of the same name

Going to give this a bump.

This one was difficult, since both were not perfect. Ahsoka's was almost too random, and was lacking a bit of punctuation. But it was significantly more funny than ISKEY's.

ISKEY's was better written, but it got kinda wordy, to the point that she trips over herself occasionally in the descriptive language. Her's also wasn't as funny.

I went for ISKEY, just because her's was better written. Good job to both of you though!

It's called personification, it's pretty commonly used. Also, atheists can still write about gods/mythology.

In my opinion, the Radioactive story was much better, as it was very creative and had quite a humor. Pluto's Downfall was a little bit boringer, and I found quite ridiculous the fact that the planets were human. My vote goes to Radioactive.