avatar
Does datapack sorcery
Member
Level 102
Transcendent Pony
5,469

Forum Posts

1 - 12 of 12

    2
    09/26/2022 2:43 pm
    Level 102 : Transcendent Pony
    Awhikax
    Awhikax avatar
    Actually the download link redirect to the original post so unless they used medveismail42's pictures it's legally fine.
    3
    08/19/2022 1:44 pm
    Level 102 : Transcendent Pony
    Awhikax
    Awhikax avatar
    Not even near, but who knows... 🙃
    3
    08/18/2022 5:44 pm
    Level 102 : Transcendent Pony
    Awhikax
    Awhikax avatar
    This can help but I'd like to add that I've never had any issue with YouTube not trusting I own/made a content I published on PMC.
    To them, PMC is a public website with public release dates we can't edit unless being an administrator so as far as I know it's fine.
    4
    08/17/2022 5:16 amhistory
    Level 102 : Transcendent Pony
    Awhikax
    Awhikax avatar
    😇 (487 at its current state)
    3
    08/16/2022 1:35 pm
    Level 102 : Transcendent Pony
    Awhikax
    Awhikax avatar
    "That copyright thing" is quite simple when you know how to proceed - can take a bit of time but not too much honestly (it mostly takes time the first time). Feel free to reach me out if you need some help with that.
    3
    08/16/2022 1:34 pm
    Level 102 : Transcendent Pony
    Awhikax
    Awhikax avatar
    No need to be a group to complain about something. As long as you own the original work and don't clearly allow people to use it you can report its use in many cases.
    3
    08/16/2022 1:33 pm
    Level 102 : Transcendent Pony
    Awhikax
    Awhikax avatar
    This is not allowed. Aspirin60 is actually legally allowed to claim the YouTuber's video.
    7
    08/16/2022 1:31 pm
    Level 102 : Transcendent Pony
    Awhikax
    Awhikax avatar
    Nope but I've quite some experience with copyright issues. Feel free to reach me out if you need some help with that kind of stuff.
    6
    07/15/2021 6:06 pm
    Level 102 : Transcendent Pony
    Awhikax
    Awhikax avatar
    Beep beep I'm a sheep
    1
    01/15/2021 12:59 pmhistory
    Level 102 : Transcendent Pony
    Awhikax
    Awhikax avatar
    Hi, is there any way I could be included ? O:)
    My IGN is the same as my PMC nickname.
    2
    06/30/2020 12:14 pm
    Level 102 : Transcendent Pony
    Awhikax
    Awhikax avatar
    Indeed I misspoke about the versions, I'll detail a bit more my point of view below.

    My Response (In Spoiler for the same reason as you)
    - As far as merging the datapacks is concerned, I had seen it and thought it was a good idea. As I said it will indeed be easier to use for new datapack developers, but I still stand by my position about having pre-written code (in addition to not being commented on).
    - As far as optimization is concerned I'll look at it in detail later, I'm very busy at the moment. I'll try to think about sending you a private message. ;-)
    - What I was criticizing here was precisely the fact that the version was changed during the event, in case all participants couldn't update their datapack. If everyone could do it, great!
    - Indeed I hadn't paid attention to the names of the participants. The fact of putting messages in the chat is then debatable. Some people like to have them, others hate them (because it can flood for example). I'm in the 2nd category, but it's a personal preference so I wouldn't criticize this choice.
    2
    06/29/2020 4:49 pm
    Level 102 : Transcendent Pony
    Awhikax
    Awhikax avatar
    Finally an event about datapacks... Unfortunately, a framework is imposed!

    It poses many problems in my opinion:
    - We (datapack creators) don't all have the same way of coding and that can disturb more than one. I know that this is also done so that everyone can try to do something, however I don't find the way it was done intuitive.
    - The imposed framework is globally badly coded. For having a look at the code there are unfortunately much better things to do, which is disturbing for an event! It would have been necessary to review some parts, especially in terms of optimization (even if I know that compatibility is not always easy to manage). Commenting on what has been done also seems very important to me in the context where some people will use it as a base.
    - Modifying the framework for 1.16 is a very bad idea. I know that the event was launched in 1.15 and that 1.16 (which allows more things) is out. Unfortunately doing a datapack event on two versions can cause compatibility problems. Either people playing with it will have to change versions, or the creators will have to update them once their work is done for a version that is still unstable.
    - The recurring presence (each time the datapack is loaded etc...) of the name of the host of the event is also disturbing. I know that this argument may seem silly but it offers a lot of visibility for something that is unfortunately not worth it.

    Anyway, I'm not sending this comment to denigrate the work that has been done upstream, but to suggest to review in the future the points I criticized.I'm not completely opposed to the idea of imposing a framework, but it has to be clear to everyone and this is just my opinion.

    Awhikax

1 - 12 of 12

Planet Minecraft

Website

© 2010 - 2022
www.planetminecraft.com

Welcome