You know what would be great, if instead of bickering we actually stayed on topic. Any further deviations from the topic or flaming will result in warning/bans.
I would highly suggest doing the terraforming first before you keep going, certain areas will of course look better flat (like the store and the car park) but having different elevations will do wonders for the overall look of your city etc.
Forgive me if this was already addressed and I just missed it but how can we realistically draw a line between what is a worthless 'joke' blog and what is just some satirical content? Do we delete all satirical content or do we do it on a case by case basis? In my opinion a case by case basis is an awful approach as users will have no way of knowing if they are breaking a rule or not. I also think it would be absurd to ban all satirical content as not only is that pointless, it too would have to be done on a case by case basis. Also, blogs like the illuminate triangle blogs and the delete system 32 blogs already break other rules so I don't see why we need another rule that punishes members who really haven't done anything wrong.
But really, a lot of these joke blogs already fall under spam (Illuminati look I found a triangle blogs for example) and the rest can be considered by many to not be 'content'. An issue can be found regarding how the rule is written, are all forms of satirical content prohibited? Just the spam ones that already break the spam rule? Or is it a case by case basis which always brings up issues?
Dat sexism though. You don't have to be a guy to comment on the looks of the shoes. They are all ugly imo but if he wants to go for practicality then he would have to try them on.
But in the spirit of helping the little ones. This is a photo that I took after PMC had a funny wunny derpy moment causing old mods to randomly appear.
