"The red coat has evolved from being the British
infantryman's ordinary uniform to a garment retained only for
ceremonial purposes. Its official adoption dates from February 1645,
when the Parliament of England passed the New Model Army ordinance. The new English Army was formed of 22,000 men, divided into 12 foot regiments of 600 men each, one dragoon regiment of 1000 men, and the artillery, consisting of 900 guns. The infantry regiments wore coats of Venetian red
with white facings. A contemporary comment on the New Model Army dated 7
May 1645 stated "the men are Redcoats all, the whole army only are
distinguished by the several facings of their coats".^[2][3]


Reenactors in the red-coated uniform of the 33rd Regiment of Foot as worn during the Napoleonic Wars between 1812 and 1816. Note the brighter scarlet of the officer on the right.


There had been isolated instances of red military clothing pre-dating
its general adoption by the New Model Army. The uniforms of the Yeoman of the Guard (formed 1485) and the Yeomen Warders (also formed 1485) have traditionally been in Tudor red and gold.^[3]:3 The Gentlemen Pensioners of James I (now the Gentlemen-at-Arms) had worn red with yellow feathers".^[4]
At Edgehill, the first battle of the Civil War, the King's people had
worn red coats, as had at least two Parliamentary regiments".^[5] However none of these examples constituted the national uniform that the red coat was later to become.^[3]


The English red coat made its first appearance on a European continental battlefield at the Battle of the Dunes
in 1658. A Protectorship army had been landed at Calais the previous
year and "every man had a new red coat and a new pair of shoes".^[6]
The English name from the battle comes from the major engagement
carried out by the "red-coats". To the amazement of continental
observers they stormed sand-dunes 150 feet (46 m) high fighting
experienced Spanish soldiers from their summits with musket fire and push of pike.^[7][8]


The adoption and continuing use of red by most British/English soldiers after the Restoration (1660) was the result of circumstances rather than policy, including the relative cheapness of red dyes.^[9] Red was by no means universal at first, with grey and blue coats also being worn.^[3]:16 There is no known basis for the myth that red coats were favoured because they did not show blood stains. Blood does in fact show on red clothing as a black stain.


Prior to 1707 colonels of regiments made their own arrangements for
the manufacture of uniforms under their command. This ended when a royal
warrant of 16 January 1707 established a Board of General Officers to
regulate the clothing of the army. Uniforms supplied were to conform to
the "sealed pattern" agreed by the board.^[3]:47–48


From an early stage red coats were lined with contrasting colours and turned out to provide distinctive regimental facings (lapels, cuffs and collars). Examples were blue for the 8th Regiment of Foot, green for the 5th Regiment of Foot, yellow for the 44th Regiment of Foot and buff for the 3rd Regiment of Foot.
1747 saw the first of a series of clothing regulations and royal
warrants that set out the various facing colours and distinctions to be
borne by each regiment.^[10] An attempt at standardisation was made following the Childers Reforms
of 1881, with English and Welsh regiments having white, Scottish
yellow, Irish green and Royal regiments dark blue. However some
regiments were subsequently able to obtain the reintroduction of
historic facing colours that had been uniquely theirs.^[11][12]

British soldiers fought in scarlet tunics for the last time at the Battle of Gennis
in the Sudan on 30 December 1885. They formed part of an expeditionary
force sent from Britain to participate in the Nile Campaign of 1884-85,
wearing the "home service uniform" of the period including scarlet
tunics, although some regiments sent from India were in khaki drill. A
small detachment of infantry which reached Khartoum by steamer on 28 January 1885 were ordered to fight in their red coats in order to let the Mahdist rebels know that the real British forces had arrived.^[13]

The uniform of the Coldstream Guards c. 1900 in a painting by William Barnes Wollen

Even after the adoption of khaki service dress in 1902, most British infantry and some cavalry regiments continued to wear scarlet tunics on parade and for off-duty "walking out dress", until the outbreak of the First World War in 1914.

Scarlet tunics ceased to be general issue upon British mobilisation
in August 1914. The Brigade of Guards resumed wearing their scarlet full
dress in 1920 but for the remainder of the army red coats were only
authorised for wear by regimental bands and officers in mess dress or on certain limited social or ceremonial occasions (notably attendance at court functions or weddings).^[14][15][16]
The reason for not generally reintroducing the distinctive full dress
was primarily financial, as the scarlet cloth requires expensive cochineal dye.

As late as 1980, consideration was given to the reintroduction of
scarlet as a replacement for the dark blue "No. 1 dress" and khaki "No. 2
dress" of the modern British Army,
using cheaper and fadeless chemical dyes instead of cochineal. Surveys
of serving soldiers' opinion showed little support for the idea and it
was shelved.

Modern use in Commonwealth armies

In the modern British army, scarlet is still worn by the Foot Guards, the Life Guards, and by some regimental bands or drummers for ceremonial purposes. Officers and NCOs
of those regiments which previously wore red retain scarlet as the
colour of their "mess" or formal evening jackets. Some regiments turn
out small detachments, such as colour guards, in scarlet full dress at
their own expense. e.g. the Yorkshire Regiment before amalgamation. The Royal Gibraltar Regiment has a scarlet tunic in its winter dress.

Scarlet is also retained for some full dress, military band or mess
uniforms in the modern armies of a number of the countries that made up
the British Empire. These include the Australian, Jamaican, New Zealand, Fijian, Canadian, Kenyan, Ghanaian, Indian, Singaporean, Sri Lankan and Pakistani armies.^[17] The Royal Canadian Mounted Police also wear a Red Serge jacket, based on a British military pattern tunic.

Red coat as a symbol

The epithet "redcoats" is familiar throughout much of the former
British Empire, even though this colour was by no means exclusive to the
British Army. The entire Danish Army wore red coats up to 1848 and particular units in the German, French, Austro-Hungarian, Russian, Bulgarian and Romanian armies retained red uniforms until 1914 or later. Amongst other diverse examples, Spanish hussars, Japanese army and United States Marine Corps and the United States Army Band bandsmen, and Serbian
generals had red tunics as part of their gala or court dress. However
the extensive use of this colour by British, Indian and other Imperial
soldiers over a period of nearly three hundred years made red uniform a
veritable icon of the British Empire. The significance of military red as a national symbol was endorsed by King William IV (reigned 1830–1837) when light dragoons and lancers had scarlet jackets substituted for their previous dark blue, hussars adopted red pelisses and even the Royal Navy were obliged to adopt red facings instead of white. Most of these changes were reversed under Queen Victoria (1837–1901). A red coat and black tricorne remains part of the ceremonial and out-of-hospital dress for in-pensioners at the Royal Hospital Chelsea.

American Revolution

In the United States, "Redcoat" is associated in cultural memory with
the British soldiers who fought against the colonists during the American Revolutionary War: the Library of Congress possesses several examples of the uniforms the British Army used during this time^[18]
Most soldiers that fought the colonists wore the red coat though the
Hessian mercenaries and some locally recruited loyalist units had blue
or green clothing.



Accounts of the time usually refer to British soldiers as "Regulars"
or "the King's men", however, there is evidence of the term "red coats"
being used informally, as a colloquial expression. During the Siege of Boston, on 4 January 1776, Gen. George Washington uses the term "red coats" in a letter to Joseph Reed.^[19]
In an earlier letter dated 13 October 1775, Washington used a variation
of the expression, stating, "whenever the Redcoat gentry pleases to
step out of their Intrenchments."^[20] Major General John Stark of the Continental Army was purported to have said during the Battle of Bennington
(16 August 1777), "There are your enemies, the Red Coats and the
Tories. They are ours, or this night Molly Stark sleeps a widow!"^[21]

Other pejorative nicknames for British soldiers included "bloody
backs" (in a reference to both the colour of their coats and the use of
flogging as a means of punishment for military offences) and "lobsters"
(most notably in Boston around the time of the Boston Massacre,
owing to the fact that a boiled American lobster is always bright red
and near perfect match to the colour of the late 18th century uniform.)
The earliest reference to the association with the lobster appears in
1740, just before the French and Indian War.^[18]

Rationale for red

From the modern perspective, the retention of a highly conspicuous
colour such as red for active service appears inexplicable and
foolhardy, regardless of how striking it may have looked on the parade
ground. However, in the days of the musket (a weapon of limited range and accuracy) and black powder,
battle field visibility was quickly obscured by clouds of smoke. Bright
colours provided a means of distinguishing friend from foe without
significantly adding risk. Furthermore, the vegetable dyes used until
the 19th century would fade over time to a pink or ruddy-brown, so on a
long campaign in a hot climate the colour was less conspicuous than the
modern scarlet shade would be.^[18]
As battles of the time were also commonly fought in large, conspicuous
lines and columns on the battlefield with volley fire, the individual
soldier was not a target by himself, making the obviousness of his
presence immaterial.

As noted above, no historical basis can be found for the suggestion
that the colour red was favoured because of the supposedly demoralising
effect of blood stains on a uniform of a lighter colour. In his book British Military Uniforms
(Hamylyn Publishing Group 1968), the military historian W.Y. Carman
traces in considerable detail the slow evolution of red as the English
soldier's colour, from the Tudors to the Stuarts. The reasons that
emerge are a mixture of financial (cheaper red, russet or crimson dyes),
cultural (a growing popular sense that red was the national English
colour, however the cockades
remained as the flag as the national colors above the varied uniforms
in any nation's army and navy and worn by civilians too) and simple
chance (an order of 1594 is that coats "be of such colours as you can
best provide").

Before the Tudors red as uniforms or rather, cloth livrees was used and provided for the household personnel -included guard troops- by most European Royal Houses and Italian or Church principalities, as a matter of official rich distinction and gala of palatine royal office in traditions dating back to the Roman Empire itself, and continued all through the Middle Ages by the hierarchy of colors distinguishing the Roman Church.

During the English Civil War
red dyes were imported in large quantities for use by units and
individuals of both sides, though this was the beginning of the trend
for long overcoats. The ready availability of red pigment made it
popular for military clothing and the dying process required for red
involved only one stage. Other colours involved the mixing of dyes in
two stages and accordingly involved greater expense; blue, for example,
could be obtained with woad, but more popularly it became the much more
expensive indigo. In financial terms the only cheaper alternative was
the grey-white of undyed wool — an option favoured by the French,
Austrian, Spanish and other Continental armies.^[22] The formation of the first English standing army (Oliver Cromwell's New Model Army
in 1645) saw red clothing as the standard dress. As Carman comments
"The red coat was now firmly established as the sign of an Englishman".^[23]

On traditional battlefields with large engagements, visibility was
not considered a military disadvantage until the general adoption of rifles in the 1850s, followed by smokeless powder
after 1880. The value of drab clothing was quickly recognised by the
British Army, who introduced khaki drill for Indian and colonial warfare
from the mid-19th century on. As part of a series of reforms following
the Second Boer War, (which had been fought in this inconspicuous clothing of Indian origin) a darker khaki
serge was adopted in 1902 for service dress in Britain itself. From
then on, the red coat continued as a dress item only, retained for
reasons both of national sentiment and its value in recruiting. The
British military authorities were more practical in their considerations
than their French counterparts, who incurred heavy casualties by
retaining highly visible blue coats and red trousers for active service
until several months into World War I.^[24]

Material used

Whether scarlet or red, the uniform coat has historically been made
of wool with a lining of a loosely woven wool known as bay to give shape
to the garment. The modern scarlet wool is supplied by "Abimelech
Hainsworth" and is much lighter than the traditional material, which was
intended for hard wear on active service.^[22]

The cloth for private soldiers used up until the late 18th century
was plain weave broadcloth weighing 16 oz per square yard, made from
coarser blends of English wool. The weights often quoted in contemporary
documents are given per running yard, though; so for a cloth of
54" width a yard weighed 24 oz. This sometimes leads to the erroneous
statement that the cloth weighed 24 oz per square yard.

Broadcloth is so called not because it is finished wide, 54" not
being particularly so, but because it was woven nearly half as wide
again and shrunk down to finish 54". This shrinking, or milling, process
made the cloth very dense, bringing all the threads very tightly
together, and gave a felted blind finish to the cloth. These
factors meant that it was harder wearing, more weatherproof and could
take a raw edge; the hems of the garment could be simply cut and left
without hemming as the threads were so heavily shrunk together as to
prevent fraying.

Officers' coats were made from superfine broadcloth;
manufactured from much finer imported Spanish wool, spun finer and with
more warps and wefts per inch. The result was a slightly lighter cloth
than that used for privates, still essentially a broadcloth and
maintaining the characteristics of that cloth, but slightly lighter and
with a much finer quality finish.

Colours; The dye used for privates' coats of the infantry, guard and
line, was madder. A vegetable dye, it was recognised as economical,
simple and reliable and remained the first choice for lower quality reds
from the ancient world until chemical dyes became cheaper in the latter
19th century.

Infantry NCOs, some cavalry regiments and many volunteer corps (which
were often formed from prosperous middle class citizens who paid for
their own uniforms) used various mock scarlets; a brighter red
but derived from cheaper materials than the cochineal used for officers
coats. Various dye goods were used for these middle quality reds, but lac, pigment extracted from the vegetable resin shellac, was the most common basis.

Officers' superfine broadcloth was dyed true scarlet with cochineal, a dye derived from insects. Much more expensive, but a colour world famous and the speciality of 18th-century English dyers.

Other military usage

Members of the United States Marine Band wear red uniforms for performances at the White House
and elsewhere. This is a rare survival of the common 18th-century
practice of having military bandsmen wear coats in reverse colours to
the rest of a given unit (U.S. Marines wear blue/black tunics with red
facings so U.S. Marine bandsmen wear red tunics with blue/black
facings).

Detachments from some units of the Canadian Forces
wear ceremonial scarlet uniforms for special occasions or parades. In
addition the scarlet uniform is the ceremonial dress for cadets at the Royal Military College of Canada.

The Brazilian Marine Corps also wear the red coat as a part of their ceremonial uniform.

The combined Danish-Norwegian army wore red uniforms from the 17th
century until the occupation of Norway by the Swedes in 1814. Most
Danish Army infantry, cavalry and artillery regiments continued to wear
red coats until they were replaced by dark blue service tunics in 1848.
The modern Royal King's People of Denmark continues to wear the historic
red on special ceremonial occasions.^[25]

The Irish Brigade of the French Army (1690-1792) wore red coats supposedly to show their origins and continued loyalty to the cause of Jacobitism. Red coats were also worn by the Swiss mercenary regiments in the French Army from the mid-17th to early 19th centuries.

Venezuela

At the beginning of the 19th century, the Ejército Libertador
(the Army of Liberation), inherited from the British Legion the red
hussar cavalry uniforms used by the Company of Honor Guard of the
Liberator Simon Bolivar.

In present-day Venezuela the red coat is part of the parade uniforms of the Regimiento de Guardia de Honor (Regiment of Presidential Guards);^[26] the Compañia de Honor "24 de Junio" (Company of Honor "24 de Junio")^[27] and the new National Militia Bolivariana.^[28][29]"

>I DO NOT OWN THIS WRITING OR THE LINKS ABOVE - IT IS ALL TAKEN FROM WIKIPEDIA.<