SuperHD!

O___O

Well, Needless to say I was surprised as well...

Here's some advice though:

Larger resolution texture packs were created because the artist wanted to put more depth, detail, and believability into the pack. I don't know of any (popular) texture pack that is popular because of it's resolution.

Resolution isn't why people download texture packs, they do it because they want it to look good.

Perhaps, with this style of texture, you should scale down to a 16x or a 32x, as with this current 1024x, It really looks empty.

Good luck on your texture pack.

Go to java in control panel and type -Xmx2048M, thats the one i use cause im not picky about ram usage on a 20 gb card

Go to java in control panel and type -Xmx2048M, thats the one i use cause im not picky about ram usage on a 20 gb card

I can barely run photo realism

How bout a 8192x8192 pack? Or a 16384x16384 pack!?!?

*sees thread*
I can't run this texture pack... it's too bad because I think this'll look SUPER REALISTIC!!! Possibly more realistic than LB Photo Re-
*sees grass texture*
Well... I didn't expect this...

LOL FAIL. IF IT IS SO HIGH RESOLUTION MAKE IT WORTH IT I MEAN REALLY A CRAPPY TEXTURE PACK

Joe Miner

creeperinmyhouse

Joe Miner
OMG,................... I have only finished 3 blocks! It's not a texturepack yet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i know, you finished 3 blocks. Thats why i said that, i wanted to see what one of those blocks looked like, i was asking if you could post a picture of one of those blocks textures, i never said it was a texture pack yet

Ooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Well, here's the side of the grass block:

*facepalm*
Well, that was NOT what I expected xD

creeperinmyhouse

Joe Miner

creeperinmyhousewhy would someone possibly need that high resolution, your not playing minecraft anymore, now your playing reality lol. If a 64 resolution texture pack can look super awesome i dont see why people must go any higher xD, i would really love a screenshot of it though

OMG,................... I have only finished 3 blocks! It's not a texturepack yet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i know, you finished 3 blocks. Thats why i said that, i wanted to see what one of those blocks looked like, i was asking if you could post a picture of one of those blocks textures, i never said it was a texture pack yet

Ooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Well, here's the side of the grass block:

Joe Miner

creeperinmyhousewhy would someone possibly need that high resolution, your not playing minecraft anymore, now your playing reality lol. If a 64 resolution texture pack can look super awesome i dont see why people must go any higher xD, i would really love a screenshot of it though

OMG,................... I have only finished 3 blocks! It's not a texturepack yet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i know, you finished 3 blocks. Thats why i said that, i wanted to see what one of those blocks looked like, i was asking if you could post a picture of one of those blocks textures, i never said it was a texture pack yet

creeperinmyhousewhy would someone possibly need that high resolution, your not playing minecraft anymore, now your playing reality lol. If a 64 resolution texture pack can look super awesome i dont see why people must go any higher xD, i would really love a screenshot of it though

OMG,................... I have only finished 3 blocks! It's not a texturepack yet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anything above 256x will start to melt your computer, no matter how good it is.

why would someone possibly need that high resolution, your not playing minecraft anymore, now your playing reality lol. If a 64 resolution texture pack can look super awesome i dont see why people must go any higher xD, i would really love a screenshot of it though

I should be able to run it.

I have 16GB of ram. =3 I can rune 512x, double it, maybe. =3

8gb of ram can't handle it, Because I think it is RAM not GPU the one who is loading the textures, right? Loading not rendering. My computer has not really bad graphics card but can run around 80 frames per second and can run HD texturepacks(Or resource packs whatever) without problem, My computer can't load 512x texturepacks only 128x texturepacks without any problems

I have 8GB RAM and a 1GB Graphics card(HD) and I can't run 512x512

Make a 8192x8192 texturepack

mines 1gb ram and intel mobile 965

I could run it.

On my 4gb Vaio laptop with Intel HD graphics.. xDD

only 1 person can run that texpack

I could run it!

This tickles my fancy, since it's like a hipster TP. No one can use it, so it's cool.

lol

I just finished the grass block.

Agreed.

Ridiculous, not many computers would be able to run it.