Member
Level 1
New Miner
0

Forum Posts

1 - 8 of 8

    RailCast
    10/21/2014 9:55 pm
    Level 1 : New Miner
    Here's the thing about science. Science requires models to have explanatory and predictive power to be accepted as theory. No model is perfect and all are updated and changed as new information comes about. That's what make science the one process that can get us as close as possible to the truth of the matter.

    And until science has concluded everything, you are free to fill the gaps with what ever you want. I personally choose to reserve judgement on any matter which cannot be tested. Maybe that's why I'm not a theoretical physicist or a cosmologist. I like to relegate my efforts t the things that are within reach.
    1
    RailCast
    10/21/2014 9:43 pm
    Level 1 : New Miner
    It isn't a protestant thing to shove creation down your throat. It is a fundamentalist thing, where your belief about God is so narrow that you can't have anything contradict the bible/quoran/<insert miscellaneous holy script>. Because for them, that's their only connection to their God.
    1
    RailCast
    10/21/2014 9:39 pm
    Level 1 : New Miner
    I had seen in a documentary that some people think that the four fundamental forces were a single super force when the universe was a singularity. Then one of the forces (speculated to be gravity) split from the others causing the big bang.
    1
    RailCast
    10/21/2014 9:37 pm
    Level 1 : New Miner
    Funny you say that. It's been said by some notable astrophysicists that if you were to summarize all the positive and all the negative energy in the universe, the sum is approximately zero. So, much the way we are still apes right now, the whole universe is still nothing.
    1
    RailCast
    10/21/2014 8:04 pm
    Level 1 : New Miner
    As with many things that depends on the context. The error made by many apologists is that they assume that all things that use the word "evolution" are therefore related theories.

    -Biologists looked at organisms and saw that they changed over time, and they developed over centuries the modern synthesis of the theory of evolution.

    -Likewise chemists and physicists described how elements decay and fuse to form new elements which they described as a chemical evolution.

    -Cosmologists and astrophysicists studies the skies and how celestial bodies form and move in complex patterns and described cosmic evolution. And there are countless other examples from different scientific communities.

    All of these models have nothing to do with one another but instead are different fields all describing how the things they study can change over time.

    The problem is that apologists like to speak of "evolutionists" as if all of these models that were independently derived by thousands of researchers in completely separate fields spanning hundreds of years all worked on one theory. All because they can't understand that you aren't supposed to conflate the terminology from one field of science with that of another.
    1
    RailCast
    10/21/2014 7:51 pm
    Level 1 : New Miner
    "The earth and everything in it, the stars and the skies, and humans. Everything is created..but from what?"

    Well all of those things are composed of matter, except for the "skies." The skies is to vague to define. From what I've heard some models in physics suggest that all matter is in fact a form energy. I also disagree with your use of the colloquial term "created" I believe it misrepresents the facts of the matter by implicitly implying that it was all consciously created with intent.

    "Evolutionists talk about the big bang theory but they always fail to address the issue about what initiated the big bang." Evolutionists" do not exist, that is a term used mainly by religious apologists who created it to mean anyone who believes or speaks about anything that involves the word "evolution" which means to change over time. This term refers to a wide variety of people and experts in multiple separate fields.
    Molecular Biologists, virologists, pathologists, anthropologists, geologists, etc. do not discuss the big bang, cosmologists, astrophysicists, and to some degree quantum physicists discuss the big bang. And they don't fail to address it, the official position of the scientific community at this time is: We cannot say with any reasonable degree of certainty what caused the big bang. The reason this is said is because of the intellectual honesty to not assert what cannot be supported.

    No one knows what caused the "singularity," as it is sometimes called, to expand into what we now call the universe. The reason we can't really say is because our knowledge of physics only applies once the universe exists (the moment following the big bang).
    1
    RailCast
    10/21/2014 6:14 pm
    Level 1 : New Miner
    We are not selling anything, we are offering services.
    1
    RailCast
    10/21/2014 1:16 pm
    Level 1 : New Miner
    That's fine if you can but not all fixes are so simple, and a video doesn't exist for every specific issue. If you choose to follow that route then you take the chance that you may spend hours trying to figure out why their fixes aren't working. And I would know I've been there and done that.

    It's the same logic that applies to a myriad services, because we don't want to take the time or effort to learn it, do it, or troubleshoot it.

    But more to the point my services are there for the people who need them and if you don't require my services, kindly leave.
    1

1 - 8 of 8

Welcome