Published Apr 6th, 4/6/26 9:51 am
- 262 views • 1 today
- 13 downloads • 0 today
16
A texture pack that turns over 60 block textures into having a more missing texture like look.
If you like simple texture packs then i guess this is for you then.
Made for the Missing Textures Jam
Enjoy :)
Credits:
Texture pack by CoolGuy42443
Made using MCreator
If you like simple texture packs then i guess this is for you then.
Made for the Missing Textures Jam
Enjoy :)
Credits:
Texture pack by CoolGuy42443
Made using MCreator
| Progress | 100% complete |
| Game Version | Minecraft 1.21.8 |
| Tags |
6900061
4



Have something to say?
what does that even mean????
but yeah maybe using something like paint.net and file explorer would've been simpler but the pack is still rather good.
What the hell is paint.net??? Aseprite
also heck you mean use AI for the pack mcmeta, it's not even code
I use aseprite because i have the money, let them be if they used something out of the ordinary,
and no you can't make a pack in 2 seconds, it takes days to make a pack with more than 60 textures unless
you'er just using AI to make all of them like a moron.
your statement still stands very confusing, before you said nonsense now you're accusing them of what??
what are you even accusing them for at this point?, really.
SO WTF*CK U ANSWER ME?
I TRY TO BE PROFESSIONAL, SCREW AI, AT THAT POINT JUST DOWNLOAD A PACK FROM SOMEONE ELSE AND REPAINT IT ON YOUR OWN
Look, i'm not going to keep this argument going, but i do not agree with you and do not insult me saying i'm not a creator. do not question other people's ways to make a pack either, i literally use the most rudimentary aseprite, file explorer and freaking notepad from microslop.
I mean, why use additional tools if the pack structure is created in 2 seconds?
Especially one that works without any mods, like yours.
Paint.net didn't even launch for me, and Aceprite is easily downloaded from a torrent.
And yes, it's better to use AI to write pack.mcmeta or copy its structure from another pack.