18
The Bite Of 87
I think that Jeremy Fitzgerald was the victim of the bite of 87.This is because on night 6 of FNaF 2, when you are playing as Jeremy Fitzgerald, Phone Guy says “We have one more event scheduled for tomorrow, a birthday. You’ll be on day shift, wear your uniform, stay close to the animatronics, make sure they don’t hurt anyone”. The night after that, night 7, if you survive, you get fired, the thing is, on night 7, you played as Fritz Smith. So this means Jeremy quit, or was not there after being attacked. This also mean that Fritz sucks because he was fired after one job… I think he(Jeremy) was attacked, because of all of the notifications we see from the company to Jeremy, seems like Scott would include notifications from Jeremy to the company. But we know that Jeremy must’ve survived, because in FNaF, Phone Guy says “It’s amazing that the human body can live without the frontal lobe”, while telling Mike Schmidt(The night guard in FNaF 1) about the bite. This means that Jeremy, if he was the victim lived, but is now missing part of his brain.
Now I ask: Which animatronic bit a part of a human’s brain off of the human?
It has to be one of the animatronics from FNaF 2, as this was enough to shut down 6 (I know about some of the puppet and balloon boy theories, just bear{no pun intended} with me) animatronics?
I still can’t give an answer myself, as I don’t believe the Mangle theories. The theory states that Mangle caused the bite. This is supported by Mangle’s attack. Mangle jumps down from the ceiling of the office, towards where your frontal lobe is located.
I don’t believe this, mostly because of the fact that this is the only piece of evidence that actually makes sense.
By the time Mangle’s attack is over, the last frame before death, Mangle’s face is almost completely level with other animatronics’ faces when they attack.
I can’t really say anything about this theory though, because I myself don’t know which side to pick.
Many people still think it is Foxy from FNaF 1, as Foxy’s jaw appears broken. I can give 2 good reasons for why this theory is not true:
I just thought that this would be a cool little look into my view of the bite.
I think that Jeremy Fitzgerald was the victim of the bite of 87.This is because on night 6 of FNaF 2, when you are playing as Jeremy Fitzgerald, Phone Guy says “We have one more event scheduled for tomorrow, a birthday. You’ll be on day shift, wear your uniform, stay close to the animatronics, make sure they don’t hurt anyone”. The night after that, night 7, if you survive, you get fired, the thing is, on night 7, you played as Fritz Smith. So this means Jeremy quit, or was not there after being attacked. This also mean that Fritz sucks because he was fired after one job… I think he(Jeremy) was attacked, because of all of the notifications we see from the company to Jeremy, seems like Scott would include notifications from Jeremy to the company. But we know that Jeremy must’ve survived, because in FNaF, Phone Guy says “It’s amazing that the human body can live without the frontal lobe”, while telling Mike Schmidt(The night guard in FNaF 1) about the bite. This means that Jeremy, if he was the victim lived, but is now missing part of his brain.
Now I ask: Which animatronic bit a part of a human’s brain off of the human?
It has to be one of the animatronics from FNaF 2, as this was enough to shut down 6 (I know about some of the puppet and balloon boy theories, just bear{no pun intended} with me) animatronics?
I still can’t give an answer myself, as I don’t believe the Mangle theories. The theory states that Mangle caused the bite. This is supported by Mangle’s attack. Mangle jumps down from the ceiling of the office, towards where your frontal lobe is located.
I don’t believe this, mostly because of the fact that this is the only piece of evidence that actually makes sense.
By the time Mangle’s attack is over, the last frame before death, Mangle’s face is almost completely level with other animatronics’ faces when they attack.
I can’t really say anything about this theory though, because I myself don’t know which side to pick.
Many people still think it is Foxy from FNaF 1, as Foxy’s jaw appears broken. I can give 2 good reasons for why this theory is not true:
- When Foxy runs into your office, for a frame or two, Foxy’s jaw appears completely fine. Some people think this is something Scott overlooked, but give him some more credit. It is obvious that Scott sees every detail in the game, so I don’t think that this is something Scott overlooked. I think some people only say this just because they want their theory to be deemed true among more people.
- If Foxy had caused the bite of 87, then the entire line of animatronics would’ve been scrapped, not just they toys. That is something so serious that every animatronic device in the building would need to be scrapped.
I just thought that this would be a cool little look into my view of the bite.
Soory I haven't uploaded in...forever, I've been quite busy. But I hoped you enjoy, and please don't hate in the comments, but give your view on the event.
Bye!
BTW, in the comments, don't hate or be stupid.I'm fine if i didnt explain something clearly and you're confused.But one person was arguing with me about how the Chica's dont need teeth, I dont even mention Chica or Toy Chica...Please, think before posting a comment.Again, post your view, but dont hate or be idiotic.
Credit | http://lillyblossomthepony.deviantart.com/art/Jeremy-Fitzgerald-494617305 |
Tags |
tools/tracking
3158352
6
my-view-on-the-bite-of-1987-fnaf-theory
Create an account or sign in to comment.
and thats a song...
and it kinda does talk about the bite of 87 if you watch carefully.