About a month ago I uploaded two puzzle maps. The first one "Enigma" got some really nice feedback in the comments. However on the second map "Pits and Doors" nobody has given any feedback. I wanted feedback so that people can read it. I always look at comments and when I don't see any I'm more sceptical. So I was wandering if there is somebody that can play "Pits and Doors" and give some feedback in the comments. I am not asking for hearts and diamonds. If someone can help me I would be really grateful. Thank you!
Edit: You don't have to finish the map as it is really challenging. Just get the main idea and play as much as you like.
Edit: You don't have to finish the map as it is really challenging. Just get the main idea and play as much as you like.
2
It might just be because people assume Pits and Doors is a sequel to Enigma, since they have near identical aesthetics. So if they're going to try any of your puzzle maps, they'll be going to Enigma since that one is older, had more more activity, and is generally more well known. And then they never get around to Pits and Doors because Enigma is very repayable, deceptively long, and the fact that the people who originally played it are still trying to beat it to this day.
You said mention someone who compared Enigma to a new type of math. I think it's more like a Rubik's Cube. It's not something you solve right away. Instead, you slowly chip away at it, aimlessly shifting around the pieces until you have a break through. You don't challenge the puzzle, you study it.
So it's the same reason that people wouldn't buy multiple types of Rubik's Cubes unless they're that invested in them. They don't see them as "new puzzle", they see them as "more puzzle".
You said mention someone who compared Enigma to a new type of math. I think it's more like a Rubik's Cube. It's not something you solve right away. Instead, you slowly chip away at it, aimlessly shifting around the pieces until you have a break through. You don't challenge the puzzle, you study it.
So it's the same reason that people wouldn't buy multiple types of Rubik's Cubes unless they're that invested in them. They don't see them as "new puzzle", they see them as "more puzzle".
That could be very true. I didn't think of that.
