It really depends. If it's more social related and it involves proving people wrong, I'm all for it. But if it's like climbing Mount Everest, I wouldn't even think about trying. That's obviously not impossible, but comes with great difficulty. The idea behind something being impossible is it being extremely hard. Like at some point I strongly believe that we'll be able to teleport or time travel. As of now, we see that with great difficulty. Therefore, some of the greatest minds use the term "impossible."

There always is a way or a solution, you only have to find it. But finding it may take a long time and some people probably give up too early and call it "impossible". That's why I would definitely try something seemingly impossible because it's only seemingly impossible. So, in fact it is very possible, you only have to find the correct solution (which there always is one existent).

If it's a calculated risk, I'd do it. But I'd have to know what would make the task nearly impossible.

I think it depends on what the "Almost impossible" thing is.
If it's something like a nearly impossible technique to learn, then I would still try to learn it.
If it's something like: Nearly impossible to get thruough this tiny hole in a mountain cliff, going 300 km/t with a wingsuit - Chances of death is 99,99. Then no I would'nt dare do it :'D

I would probably try, but only if there's no bad consequences when I fail.

I would most likely not try, but it would depend on what it is.

What is impossible?




Nothing is Impossible

Is it just really hard to do, or is it strictly a probability thing? If it's the first one, I'd so do that.

It depends on what I'm trying to attempt.

i'd attempt to try.

We usually cannot prove that something is impossible; anything is truly possible with the right circumstances. Of course I would try. Even if I fail multiple times.

Is this thing beyond a doubt proven to be impossible or are we talking about a scenerio where it's just believed to be impossible?