//www.planetminecraft.com/css/fonts.css?v=iAIAFChsfiOXhFo1Q2xw8K3yBUtVao3WmHpU39GNnyc7p4lg,//www.planetminecraft.com/css/drip.css?v=BJyO2UTiCPoKFr22MEEp567TQ5IyFRee_WH-tgtLkaZ3zrtq,//www.planetminecraft.com/css/editor.css?v=KZn7z4R_nw79qfibWs_U9Q_-995gdKb8z7h0ICs0hdV-_lxq
{"admin":1,"judge":1,"profile":1,"widgets":1,"wall":1,"faq":1,"collections":1,"content":1,"analytics":1}
[{"name":"Admin","role_id":1},{"name":"VIP","role_id":3980},{"name":"Intellectuals","role_id":3978},{"name":"Intellectuals","role_id":3978},{"name":"Intellectuals","role_id":3978},{"name":"Intellectuals","role_id":3978},{"name":"Intellectuals","role_id":3978},{"name":"Intellectuals","role_id":3978},{"name":"Intellectuals","role_id":3978},{"name":"Intellectuals","role_id":3978},{"name":"Intellectuals","role_id":3978},{"name":"Intellectuals","role_id":3978},{"name":"Intellectuals","role_id":3978},{"name":"Intellectuals","role_id":3978},{"name":"Intellectuals","role_id":3978},{"name":"Intellectuals","role_id":3978}]
4304
GROUP
default
That does make sense, so I suppose it's about finding the balance between practical philosophy and impractical philosophy (for lack of a better word.)
In my opinion, philosophy should be part of one's pursuit of happiness, and to better understand the world around us can indeed bring just that.
And I think I have come to a conclusion with Kant's deontology...
I think the outcome of one's actions should be taken into account along with one's moral responsibilities and such.
Because if a wrong deed harbors a good outcome (to some extent,) it should be at least considered.
For example:
If one of one's responsibilities is to the moral guideline that one should ever harm/kill another, and another is attempting to take the life of a loved one, are you to idly stand by whilst your loved one dies? Isn't that going against the very rule that's holding you back from helping?
Perhaps you could find a way to render them unconscious, or hold them back, but what if they fight back? What if there is no way to help other than incapacitate, and risk killing them?
I think in a situation such as this, going against one's moral duties should be justified.
If that makes sense xd
i understand what you're trying to say and its completely valid. i would argue that with philosophy you don't always need to have a 'practical application' to what you reason out. sometimes its just for the sake of knowing 'more' or 'better'. i think, however, that the idea is very relevant when we consider less empirically accesible concepts like god, morality and philosophies like existentialism. and i think this is where kant was trying to go with the idea.
haha, you should definitely do that! (except for the not sleeping part) btw are you on the discord server 'the philosophy chat'? they do some group readings of kant's works that are very stimulating.
What I think about transcendental idealism is that it's an interesting thought experiment, but that is all it is. I'm not quite sure how to word this, and I am definitely no expert on the matter and definitely may have interpreted it wrong, but I think we ought to focus on what we can perceive at current and enjoy what we can if that makes sense.
As for Kantian deontology, I might actually have to get back to you on that one due to the moral dilemmatic nature of it.
Philosophical sleepless slumber here I come!