1
Ticket #5340
Status: Closed
Opened by LightlySaltedBuilder
Type:
Feature Request
Views:
214
Access:
Public
Opened:
11/24/17 6:21 pm 11/24/17 6:21 pm

Add a Minimum Size Requirement For Builds

To increase the quality of projects, I think there should be a minimum size for builds. This would mean any build that does not reach a certain size, possibly 50x50 blocks, cannot be posted. Exceptions can be made for builds over 60 blocks tall.

I think this would be helpful because it would get rid of small projects that have very little content. You would still be able to make small builds, you would just have to make it in packs, essentially creating more content per post, and leading to higher quality. Also, the size isn't final, I just chose 50x50 because it seems like a good size to me.

Landscaping can also be considered part of a build, so if you have a 20x20 house, but 70x70 blocks of landscaping, then it would be allowed. However the landscaping must make a significant and recognizable change to be qualified as part of the build, meaning you cannot leave the default terrain and call it part of your build. Also, any sprucing up of terrain, such as adding custom trees, small details, bushes, etc. counts as landscaping. Basically default terrain or flat land cannot be counted as part of the measurement.

If a build seems to small then a Moderator can request the build's measurements or measure it themselves. Moderators get to decide whether it fits the requirements in the end, but member are allowed to contact another moderator and ask their verdict if they think the decision was unfair. If the build is deemed large enough to fit the requirement, then the build gets back up, and should also get a bump to make up for the unfair removal, since a removal might have hurt their views or diamonds.

In response to everyone's comments:
This will not completely get rid of smaller sized builds and sneak peaks and stuff like that, which you seem to like. First off, it's not necessary to upload the beginning of your build it it's too small, and in the end I think most people would rather look at a completed or mostly complete build, rather than the start of one. So uploading your incomplete build as sneak peaks is not necessary.

Also, you can still upload smaller builds, but you would have to bundle them, like a car bundle or tree bundle or house bundle. You can still give pre-releases, because if your build is complete enough to have something to look at, then you might have already reached the minimum. And lastly, you can still give sneak peaks. Just use the wall post feature, it'll notify your subs, who are the ones your doing it for, without cluttering the projects section with incomplete builds.

With all due respect, just because something's a practice doesn't mean it's a good thing to do. An example of this is the raffles in the skin section which were relatively recently banned. It was allowed and practiced, but was still gotten rid of because it shouldn't have been allowed. Not that we should ban pre-releases or sneak peaks, but I think we shouldn't have too much of them.

Create an account or sign in to comment.

1
04/22/2018 10:07 pm
Level 53 : Grandmaster Architect
LightlySaltedBuilder
LightlySaltedBuilder's Avatar
has closed the ticket.
1
04/18/2018 11:18 pm
Level 52 : Grandmaster Crafter
MASTER_RICKY
MASTER_RICKY's Avatar
A small builds gallery can show lot's of things around it and the inside.
1
04/18/2018 9:02 pm
Level 53 : Grandmaster Architect
LightlySaltedBuilder
LightlySaltedBuilder's Avatar
modified ticket description.
1
04/15/2018 8:26 pm
Level 52 : Grandmaster Crafter
MASTER_RICKY
MASTER_RICKY's Avatar
They can't just delete builds that looks rubbish to them.
1
04/15/2018 2:01 am
Level 52 : Grandmaster Crafter
MASTER_RICKY
MASTER_RICKY's Avatar
There's some big builds that are just big fat blocks and some 20x20 builds have interior as well.
What if something is too big, such as a city and we want to submit every single building with details and interior gallery. Its better to get a focus of a smaller whole.
1
04/15/2018 1:50 am
Level 52 : Grandmaster Crafter
MASTER_RICKY
MASTER_RICKY's Avatar
I disagree with this request
  • Some of us want to show of our progress very badly.
  • We want our subscribers to have a sneak peek.
  • Some small builds could be very elaborate.
  • The build can have multiple screenshots of different point of view.

Instead, they should catogorise builds by size in the filter.
1
04/18/2018 8:47 pm
Level 53 : Grandmaster Architect
LightlySaltedBuilder
LightlySaltedBuilder's Avatar
You can still upload progress, but you would have to bundle a few of the smaller builds together. Also, small builds can be very elaborate, but that's usually an exception. Those builds could either be bundled together, or have more details around them, for example, if it's a really elaborate detailed house, make a few more houses around or add landscaping and paths. Also, if you want to show sneak peaks you can use wall posts. The build section should be reserved for mostly completed builds.

Also, the reason for this suggestion does largely involve quality, but the builds won't filtered by quality, they'll be filtered by size, so it's not like mods are judging the quality of your build or anything.
1
04/18/2018 11:16 pm
Level 52 : Grandmaster Crafter
MASTER_RICKY
MASTER_RICKY's Avatar
So what's the point of the progress percentage? The wall posts will be kinda messy if your are working on more than one builds at the same time. 50x50 seems quite too much, how about 30x30? What if it' was done on Survival mode? That's just you.
1
04/20/2018 7:50 pm
Level 53 : Grandmaster Architect
LightlySaltedBuilder
LightlySaltedBuilder's Avatar
The progress percentage would still be useful, for example if you have a large city, you could use the bar to show how much of it is complete. You don't need the progress bar for small builds, if it's a small build you could use if interior or landscaping isn't done, but the progress bar would still have a good use for larger builds.

Also, 50x50 sound pretty reasonable to me. Maybe you don't know what it looks like, it's kind of hard even for me to visualize without a concrete example. This build I made measures out to be 40+blocks wide, probably 2-3 times as wide, so this would be an example of the minimum size of a build.

Also, what does survival mode have to do with it? The only reason I can think of is because it's harder to build in, but that's given and should be taken into account by the builders, I don't think it should get exceptions.
1
04/22/2018 7:42 pm
Level 52 : Grandmaster Crafter
MASTER_RICKY
MASTER_RICKY's Avatar
A large city is far too big. Like what I'm doing with my city, I like to furnish my buildings and show them off one by one. I like to submit individual buildings that has its own plot unless its a bunch of Townhouses and submit the interiors and angles. I build things that are the right size and should count the blocks instead. I sick of arguing. Sorry mate, no one will vote your ticket because they want to show their builds.
1
04/22/2018 10:07 pm
Level 53 : Grandmaster Architect
LightlySaltedBuilder
LightlySaltedBuilder's Avatar
I agree, I'm sick of arguing too, but you could still do what you're doing, just show off two or three building in one post. Either that, or show the bigger ones, like hotels and skyscrapers.

But yeah, screw it. No one understands what I'm trying to say, and they just repeat the same arguments I already countered. If people really want to upload small builds so bad, just let them, I'll diamond either way if it's well done.
Planet Minecraft

Website

© 2010 - 2024
www.planetminecraft.com

Welcome