Unfortunately, it's only really good for animating solely in blockbench. So limiting to some extent, but still lots of fun! This is (close, if not the exact) method that Violet over on Twitter uses for their animated vids.

:O
Congrats man! Hope you are getting some sleep with all of that!
And thank you for the tutorial! I’ve been exploring blockbench and those have been confusing me LOL

What have you done to poor Kaeya

I will be very disappointed if you don’t use “The hunt for the red October” main theme.

Oh °-°
Idk much about lyrics, I listen mostly to instrumental music and video game OST. My music taste can be defined in a sentence: "Sometimes not saying anything at all is better than saying bad things."

i’ve thought of doing this before too!!! (with tom lehrer songs lmao)
tom lehrer’s “the hunting song” mentions november
and his song “when you’re old and grey” mentions december and may!!!
btw if you listen to the songs please please tell me what you think of them i love tom lehrer and his songs are great 😁😁😁

I meant holidays and stuff like that, not years
I've got Halloween, Uprising and the songs mentioned below

So far I have 3 songs about New Year, all by the same artist
I don't want to add every Christmas song I know so there are only 2 songs that briefly mention it but I will add more

i think its my favourite too :D

2

I like the second one!

Most of the 'newspeak' falls into the catagory of slang or jargon; in both cases a significant attraction to the usage of such is as a sorting feature to identify the 'we' from the 'they'. As such, the deliberate degradation of clarity is compensated for by the percieved utility of this sorting function. {Cockney rhyming slang is an older instance of the same dynamic.}

The only reason pronouns are "terrible at easing and speeding communications" is the poor education and/or sloppiness of use of many speakers.

Nor is the current generational barrier likely to vanish, my grandparents told tales of the difficulty their grandparents had with the then current lingo.

The point of language is first and formost to communicate, just as overly euphamistic language can render meaning incomprehensible (even as it is used for the comfort of one or more parties) prioritizing rtge comfort of one party at the expense of actually communicating renders the effort void.

As example:


"Kim and Jean met at a restaurant, qmt coming from work while ltew had first visited the gym."


Anyone reading the abiove will be clueless as to who came from where as the neologisms can not be reliably linked each to its proper antecedant.
[​And, yes the sexual ambiguity of the proper names is intentional as writing she/he or he/she would stil rely on a grammatic convention of positionality that is now only rarely taught… and would still depend on the two being of opposite sexes to provide clarity.]

The english language constantly adapts new pronouns, strictly speaking in "words that replace the noun". By all technicalities, words like "bro", "chat" and "blud" have been adapted into pronouns, and these, realistically, are terrible at easing and speeding communications, as there is a generational barrier (currently). "chat doesn't like it when I do that". That isn't the proper usage of the noun. "bro thinks hes onto smth" is also using "bro" in a pronoun context. Modern pronouns have been adapted to, its the unwillingness to adapt to them that makes them so called "obscure".

I don't know half of what you said (no offense) but pronouns are also used for the comfort of the user as well as those they speak of. Neopronouns are a great example of that because they are used for nonbinary, a gender, gender nonconforming folks, and many more to help them with their identity.
If you are confused about them, just go to the wall post I have linked and there are resources to help you out ^w^

Do better. Be better. Educate yourself

Indeed.
The point of having pronouns in a language is to ease and speed communication (generally by avoiding the need to continuously repeat a noun).
In order for this function actually to work, the antecedant of a pronoun must be be not only unambiguous but sufficiently easy to determine that it is not simpler to simply repeat the noun itself.

The problem with neologisms is that the meanings are often obscure and/or ambiguous. [Examples like ginormous or prexactly notwithstanding.]
Even the older misuse of the plural in place of the indeterminate singular (an erosion that has been occuring for decades) impunes the function of the pronoun.

To advocate for unclear and ambiguous communcation is to advocate for loose and fuxxy thinking and all the ills which from it derive.