I don't really think another category would do in this case.

Categories are often used to split up the different branches of the same big tree.
But modded datapacks and vanilla datapacks are their own separate trees altogether - even though they are both trees (tree in this case being a datapack), they work on different environments which most of the time isn't compatible with eachother (a modded datapack might modify something vanilla itself doesn't have, for example), and hence can't be considered branches of the same tree.

From an user experience point of view: If you're someone who has no idea about the technical things that can be done by vanilla datapacks, you'd assume modded datapacks and vanilla datapacks as one and the same (since they're both categorized as "datapacks" at first based on the site's current design), only to then install a modded datapack in vanilla and be confused about why it doesn't work, or vice versa.

Splitting it into two categories would be a bit much, instead we could theoretically add a checkbox for something like “Requires a mod” and they could filter out those that do.

I'm none too clear on the lines between texture packs / data packs / resource packs / mods so some clarification wight be a good place to start…

Assuming I correctly understand what you mean, having at least a filter setting for those that require additional software (Optifine seems to be a commonly sited example) would make sense.
Whether an entirely seperate subfora is needed is more debatable as there may be those who prefer having only one place through which to search.
[​Which again brings up the issue of overlap between various sorts of game modifying 'things'.]


Bye the bye, this probably shoud be filled as a suggestion ticket if you find any reasonable level of support…

I 100% agree

Why? Because it's legal, unfortunately. Anyone who uses obsolescence to constantly wring money out of someone is a selfish crook at heart.

thanks

The neon green sketch outlines on a dark background looks really cool.

MOJANG MUST BOW BEFORE THIS MAN! HE IS SO MUCH BETTER AT THIS!

Yes

💯

[img]i.postimg.cc/76gFsBmy/fellicity-landon-wip.jpg[/img]

Ive drawn her again but in a neutral pose turnaround sheet so hopefully future drawings will be more consistent in shape
[img][img]i.postimg.cc/76gFsBmy/fellicity-landon-wip.jpg[/img][/img]

Drawing is hard as heck. You either draw for fun and it takes you years to get better or you study and practice really hard and it still takes you years.
Unless you already do, study things you want to get better at. I've been drawing digitally for almost 5 years and I still suck. I've started studying and practicing seriously about half a year ago. Am I good? Very arguable. Is my art better? Way better than it was before I started learning.

Btw, you will most likely hate your art even when you're good. Even artists you look up to are like that, probably because there's no such thing as perfection and human mind sucks.

I don't want this comment to be an essay, nor do I have enough knowledge about your exact situation. There's more than enough information on the internet anyway. Try not to fall out of passion for art and good luck!

Improving with any form of art is an extremely weird progression, for some people it’s exponential, but for others (me included!) it’s ALLLL over the place. You’re doing great!